Mahard Egg Farm, Inc.
Outcome
Mahard Egg Farm paid a $1.9 million civil penalty — the largest in a federal CAFO enforcement action at that time — and spent approximately $3.5 million on remedial measures to resolve Clean Water Act violations at its Texas and Oklahoma egg production facilities, including unpermitted discharge of wastewater to area waterways.
Details
Mahard Egg Farm, Inc. — Clean Water Act CAFO Violations (2005–2011)
Outcome: Texas-based Mahard Egg Farm paid a $1.9 million civil penalty and approximately $3.5 million in remedial measures — the largest federal CAFO enforcement settlement at the time — to resolve Clean Water Act violations at egg production facilities in Texas and Oklahoma.
Background
Mahard Egg Farm, Inc. is a Texas corporation operating concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) for egg production in Texas and Oklahoma. The facilities house large numbers of laying hens and generate substantial quantities of manure and wastewater that must be managed under federal Clean Water Act NPDES permits and applicable state permits.
Violations
EPA and DOJ identified multiple Clean Water Act violations at Mahard's Texas and Oklahoma facilities, including:
- Section 301 and 402 violations: Unauthorized discharges of wastewater and manure-laden stormwater to area waterways without proper NPDES permit authorization
- Improper lagoon design, construction, and operation: Wastewater lagoons were not properly designed, constructed, or operated to prevent discharges
- Inadequate grass buffer strips: Required vegetative buffer strips along waterways were insufficient in width (remediation required installation of 100-foot buffer strips)
- NPDES permit noncompliance: Ongoing failure to meet permit conditions at the facilities
- Storm water permit violations: Noncompliance with storm water discharge permits
Settlement Terms
On May 18, 2011, the EPA and DOJ announced the settlement. Under the consent decree:
- Civil penalty: $1.9 million, split equally among the U.S. government, the State of Texas, and the State of Oklahoma
- Remediation costs: Approximately $3.5 million spent on facility improvements
- Proper closure of noncompliant lagoons
- Groundwater monitoring installation
- Installation of 100-foot buffer strips along all waterways
- Updated manure disposal protocols
- Nutrient application restrictions to prevent pollutant runoff to surface and groundwater
Significance
At the time of the 2011 settlement, the $1.9 million civil penalty was described by EPA and DOJ as "the largest amount to be paid in a federal enforcement action involving a concentrated animal feeding operation." The case served as a deterrent precedent for the poultry industry and CAFO operators generally.
Primary Source: EPA — Mahard Egg Farm, Inc. Clean Water Act Settlement
How Crucible Prevents This
CAFO NPDES compliance requires facility operators to maintain and document stormwater controls, wastewater lagoon integrity, and buffer strip conditions — all of which were cited as deficient in this enforcement action. Crucible-style compliance controls at a CAFO would include: automated documentation of lagoon inspection results, permit condition checklists tied to NPDES reporting deadlines, and alerts when buffer strip or lagoon maintenance falls behind schedule. The $5.4 million total cost (penalty + remediation) vs. a much lower cost of routine compliance maintenance illustrates the financial argument for proactive environmental management.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works