Crossroads Treatment Center of Petersburg P.C., ARS Treatment Centers of New Jersey P.C., Crossroads Treatment Center of Greensboro P.C., Starting Point of Virginia P.A.
Outcome
Four affiliated SUD treatment clinics paid $863,934 to resolve False Claims Act allegations that they overbilled Virginia Medicaid for office visits by submitting claims for complex evaluations when routine check-in appointments were actually provided.
Details
Crossroads Treatment Centers — Medicaid Overbilling for SUD Office Visits (2024)
Outcome: Four affiliated substance use disorder treatment clinics paid $863,934 to the United States and the Commonwealth of Virginia to resolve allegations that they knowingly submitted false claims to Virginia Medicaid by billing complex evaluation and management codes for routine SUD treatment check-in visits.
Crossroads Treatment Center of Petersburg P.C., ARS Treatment Centers of New Jersey P.C., Crossroads Treatment Center of Greensboro P.C., and Starting Point of Virginia P.A. are part of the Crossroads chain, a private equity-owned network of more than 100 opioid treatment facilities operating across nine states, headquartered in Greenville, South Carolina.
The government alleged that the clinics billed Virginia Medicaid for office visits requiring at least two of three documentation components — a comprehensive medical history, a comprehensive medical examination, and a highly complex medical decision — when the services actually delivered were routine SUD treatment check-ins that did not meet those criteria. This constituted upcoding, a common billing fraud pattern in which a higher-reimbursement billing code is substituted for the code that accurately describes the service rendered.
The conduct was first raised by a whistleblower, Diana France, a former Director of Network Management and Contracting for Crossroads, who filed a qui tam lawsuit under the False Claims Act. The settlement was announced July 25, 2024. Under the resolution, the federal government received approximately $357,000 and the Commonwealth of Virginia received approximately $507,000. France received $60,671 as her relator share of the federal recovery.
The settlement illustrates systemic coding compliance failures at large multi-state SUD clinic chains where revenue cycle staff and clinical staff operate under production pressure and without adequate billing compliance oversight. No determination of liability was made.
How Crucible Prevents This
Crucible billing audit controls and documentation review hooks would flag the systematic pattern of high-complexity E&M code usage (office visit with comprehensive history, comprehensive exam, and highly complex medical decision-making) for a patient population receiving routine SUD check-ins. A compliance dashboard comparing billed visit complexity against documented clinical activity would surface the mismatch before submission. Anti-Kickback and False Claims Act training modules and attestation gates would create a record of policy acknowledgment.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works