UMI Learning Center
Outcome
Four operators of UMI Learning Center in San Diego pleaded guilty to defrauding California's Alternative Payment childcare benefit program of over $3.7 million by submitting false daily attendance forms claiming childcare was provided when no children were actually present.
Details
UMI Learning Center (San Diego) — Childcare Benefits Fraud Ring (2019–2023)
Outcome: Four San Diego defendants connected to UMI Learning Center pleaded guilty to defrauding California's HHS-funded Alternative Payment/Stage 2 childcare program of more than $3.7 million by falsely certifying that parents were working while collecting benefits and submitting daily attendance forms claiming childcare was provided when children were not actually present.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services funds California's "Alternative Payment Program/Stage 2 Childcare" program, which is designed to help working parents pay for childcare. In San Diego, the program is administered by Child Development Associates (CDA) and the YMCA, which disburse payments directly to approved childcare providers. Providers must submit attendance forms documenting the days and hours of care provided.
The four defendants — Mohamed Muriidi Mohamed, Amina Abdirazak Omar, Osob Abdirazak Omar, and Omar Omar — operated UMI Learning Center and carried out a systematic fraud against this program. They falsely verified to CDA and the YMCA that parents were employed or in school as required to qualify for subsidized childcare, when in fact those parents were not participating in qualifying work or education activities. The operators then submitted daily childcare attendance forms claiming services were rendered on days when no childcare was actually provided.
The scheme allowed UMI Learning Center to collect over $3.7 million in childcare benefit payments it was not entitled to receive. All four defendants were arraigned before U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major in the Southern District of California. At least one defendant was sentenced to 27 months in prison; others received varying sentences.
The case illustrates the structural vulnerability of attendance-based childcare subsidy systems when providers control both the service delivery and the documentation submitted for reimbursement, with no independent verification mechanism.
Primary Source: Four Charged in Multi-Million-Dollar Childcare Benefits Fraud Ring that Bilked California Welfare and Benefits Program for Years | DOJ
How Crucible Prevents This
Crucible's childcare-attendance verification controls would require daily sign-in and sign-out records matched against subsidy billing before reimbursement is processed. Electronic monitoring cross-checks would flag patterns where a provider claims 100% attendance across all enrolled subsidy recipients on the same days. The parent-employment-verification workflow would require periodic confirmation that parents claiming work or school hours are actually attending, preventing the false certifications at the center of the scheme.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works