City of North Charleston, South Carolina
Outcome
Three North Charleston City Council members — Jerome Sydney Heyward (agreed to plead guilty to 14 counts), Sandino Moses (agreed to plead guilty to misprision), and Mike A. Brown (charged) — were among eight individuals charged in February 2025 in a bribery and kickback scheme involving cash payments in exchange for council votes on rezoning and city contracts.
Details
City of North Charleston, South Carolina — Three City Council Members Bribery (2022–2025)
Outcome: Eight individuals — including three elected North Charleston City Council members — were charged in February 2025 in bribery, kickback, extortion, and money laundering schemes following an FBI public corruption investigation. Council member Jerome Heyward agreed to plead guilty to 14 counts; Sandino Moses agreed to plead guilty to misprision; Mike Brown was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery.
The investigation focused on multiple overlapping bribery schemes involving North Charleston city officials. In the primary scheme, Council member Jerome Heyward conspired with Council member Mike Brown and Aaron Hicks — working on behalf of a company with business before the council — to solicit and accept cash bribes in exchange for supporting a rezoning vote for the former Baker Hospital site.
FBI intercepts captured a cash payment of $1,000 to Brown and $2,500 to Heyward on April 18, 2024 — just days before the scheduled rezoning vote. Heyward agreed to plead guilty on February 21, 2025 to 14 counts including attempted extortion, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit bribery, bribery, theft, and money laundering, facing a maximum of 20 years.
Sandino Moses, elected in 2023, agreed to plead guilty to misprision of a felony for knowing about bribery and concealing it rather than disclosing it to authorities, and agreed to resign from City Council.
Primary Source: 8 Charged in North Charleston Public Corruption Schemes, including 3 City Councilmen
How Crucible Prevents This
The North Charleston scheme involved three council members simultaneously — indicating a systemic culture of cash-for-votes rather than an isolated bad actor. Crucible's vote-related payment monitoring hook cross-references any financial transactions to or from elected officials around the time of project-specific votes, flagging suspicious temporal correlations. A conflict-of-interest disclosure control requires all council members to certify no financial relationships with project applicants before any zoning or contract vote. The FBI intercepted cash payments days before the vote — Crucible's pre-vote financial disclosure requirement would have created legal documentation of the bribes before the vote even occurred.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works