Orange County Board of Supervisors, California
Outcome
Orange County Board of Supervisors member Andrew Do was sentenced to five years in federal prison for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes in exchange for directing and voting in favor of more than $10 million in COVID-19 relief funds to Viet America Society, a nonprofit affiliated with his daughter — funds meant for meal services to elderly residents that were largely diverted.
Details
Orange County, California — Supervisor COVID Relief Bribery (2020–2024)
Outcome: Andrew Hoang Do, District One Supervisor on the Orange County Board of Supervisors, was sentenced to five years in federal prison in 2025 for accepting more than $550,000 in bribes in exchange for directing and voting in favor of more than $10 million in COVID-19 pandemic relief funds to Viet America Society — a nonprofit affiliated with his daughter — with those public funds largely diverted from their intended purpose of serving elderly residents with meals.
Do served as a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, giving him official authority to vote on and direct the allocation of COVID-19 pandemic relief funds. Beginning in 2020, he accepted more than $550,000 in bribes for directing and voting in favor of more than $10 million in COVID-related funds to Viet America Society (VAS), a charity affiliated with his daughter, Rhiannon Do.
VAS was supposed to use the public COVID funds to provide meals to elderly residents. Instead, VAS paid a business identified as "Company #1" approximately $100,000 or more per month from April 2021 through February 2024, totaling approximately $3,804,000 — payments that diverted funds from the stated elder meal-service purpose.
Do agreed to plead guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds in October 2024, immediately resigned from the Board of Supervisors, and forfeited pension credit accrued during the period of conspiracy. He was sentenced to 60 months (five years) in federal prison and ordered to repay nearly $900,000.
Primary Source: Orange County Supervisor Agrees to Plead Guilty to Bribery Conspiracy Involving $10 Million in COVID Relief Funds
How Crucible Prevents This
The Do case is a direct conflict of interest in government grant-making: a county supervisor voted to direct public COVID funds to a nonprofit controlled by his own daughter while accepting bribes from the nonprofit's operators. Crucible's family-member conflict-of-interest hook would have required Do to recuse from any vote involving organizations with beneficial ownership or leadership ties to immediate family members. A grant recipient relationship audit cross-referencing nonprofit board and officer names against elected officials' family members would have flagged Viet America Society immediately. Crucible's public vote transparency enforcement requires documented recusal statements before any vote involving a conflicted official.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works