Primary Health Network
Outcome
Three leaders of Primary Health Network, a nonprofit medical organization in Sharon, Pennsylvania, pleaded guilty to wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering after a seven-year kickback scheme that diverted over $1.9 million through an intermediary vendor.
Details
Primary Health Network — Seven-Year Kickback Scheme, Sharon Pennsylvania (2013–2020)
Outcome: Drew Pierce, Jack Laeng, and Mark Marriott each pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering; sentencing occurred March 2026 with maximum exposure of 30 years combined charges.
Primary Health Network (PHN) is a nonprofit medical organization based in Sharon, Pennsylvania. Three leaders—Drew Pierce (West Middlesex, PA), Jack Laeng (Lake Milton, OH), and Mark Marriott (Sharpsville, PA)—engaged in a seven-year scheme from 2013 through 2020 to defraud the organization. The scheme operated in two phases: in 2017, the leaders arranged a single transaction involving a company called TopCoat that generated over $200,000 in inflated invoice payments; separately, from 2013 through 2020, they received kickback payments totaling more than $1.7 million.
Marriott additionally filed a false personal income tax return, failing to report the kickback income. All three pleaded guilty in fall 2025 and were sentenced in March 2026. Laeng was sentenced March 16, Marriott March 17, and Pierce March 9, 2026 in the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The case demonstrates how nonprofit leadership can exploit their positions to extract organizational funds through vendor intermediaries over extended periods. PHN serves medically underserved populations in western Pennsylvania, meaning the diverted funds directly reduced resources available for community health services.
Primary Source: Three Leaders of Primary Health Network Plead Guilty to Defrauding Non-Profit Medical Organization of Millions of Dollars
How Crucible Prevents This
Crucible's vendor-management controls requiring competitive bidding and independent approval for vendor contracts would prevent leadership from inserting a pass-through company (TopCoat) between the nonprofit and its vendors to siphon inflated invoice payments. Mandatory conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements and beneficial-ownership verification for all vendors would surface the kickback structure. The seven-year duration (2013-2020) shows how long vendor fraud can persist without systematic controls.
Don't let this happen to your organization. See how Crucible works.
See How Crucible Works